False Advertising Settlements
17 active false advertising settlements.
Financial services, mis-selling and shareholder claims
Home Our services Consumer, competition and financial services claims Financial services, mis-selling and shareholder claims Financial services, mis-selling and shareholder claims Contact us to find out more or to discuss your potential claim Get in touch When you invest your savings, buy shares in a company, make decisions about what to do with your pension, or borrow money, you have a right to expect that you will be treated fairly, given appropriate advice, the information you are provided with will be accurate and not misleading, and that all the relevant laws and regulations will be complied with. Leigh Day has a team specialising in claims for individuals who have suffered a loss as a result of mis-sold investments or other financial products, or other unethical and illegal behaviour by financial services providers or companies. Our work is vitally important to protect individuals who have lost their savings or been misled about an investment decision or other financial product. We stand up for the rights of individual investors, savers, pension holders and consumers of financial services. How we can help If a financial product or investment has been mis-sold to you, if you invested in a company or investment fund that has been poorly managed and it has caused you to suffer financial losses, or if you have been treated unfairly in connection with a loan or other financial product, it is likely that many others like you are in a similar position and have suffered similar losses. In this situation, we may be able to help you to obtain comp
List of Class Actions
Class Actions in Canada We are a Canada-wide class action law firm with offices in Montreal, Quebec and Ottawa, Ontario. If you are Canadian, the following class actions may be of interest to you. Current Successes All Cases Public Interest Privacy Automotive Consumer Protection False Advertising Medical Devices Pharmaceutical Price-Fixing Product Liability Securities Public Interest Mar 18, 2024 Active Uber Sexual Assault Canadian Class Action New Feb 22, 2023 Active The girls around Robert G. Miller - Class Action New Jan 24, 2019 Active Allan Memorial Institute Experiments Class Action
Adobe Subscription Plan Canadian Class Action
Adobe Subscription Plan Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (2) ON May 07, 2026 [en] Statement of Claim QC May 07, 2026 [en] Application for Authorization CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a Canadian class action against Adobe Systems Canada Inc. and Adobe, Inc. for alleged deceptive practices related to its subscription services, which deploy misleading enrollment and automatic renewal schemes intended to induce consumers to unwittingly enroll in costly subscriptions. Consumers are routinely misled about key terms of subscriptions, including the duration of subscriptions, renewal conditions, and cancellation policies. The potential class action alleges that for years, Adobe has harmed consumers by enrolling them in its default, most lucrative subscription plan without clearly disclosing important plan terms. More specifically, Adobe fails to adequately disclose to consumers that by signing up for the “Annual, Paid Monthly” subscription plan (“APM plan”), they are agreeing to a year-long commitment and a hefty early termination fee (“ETF”) that can amount to hundreds of dollars. It is alleged that during the enrollment process, Adobe hides material terms of its APM plan in fine print and behind optional textboxes and
Apple iPhones 15 and 16 AI Canadian Class Action
Apple iPhones 15 and 16 AI Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (2) ON May 11, 2026 [en] Statement of Claim QC May 06, 2026 [en] Application for Authorization Consumer Law Group has filed a class action against Apple Inc. and Apple Canada Inc. with regards to allegations of deceptive marketing and advertising of the Apple iPhone 16 suite of products. It is alleged that Apple marketed and promoted the sale of the iPhone 16 on the basis of Artificial Intelligence features that were not actually available at the time of the advertisement, or at the time of purchase, some of which remain unavailable today. As a result, consumers got less than their money’s worth, in purchasing a phone that did not have features Apple prominently advertised. It is alleged that Apple violated the Consumer Protection Act, the Competition Act, and other applicable laws. In May 2026, Apple settled a $250 million class action in the United State with regards to its deceptive and misleading advertising and marketing of Apple iPhone 16, and the Apple Intelligence Artificial Intelligence features they were supposed to be equipped with at the time of being available for purchase. If you or someone you know has bought an Apple iPhone 16 product
Restoro-Reimage Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } March 2026 FTC sends checks to people who paid for computer repair services The FTC is sending checks to people who paid for computer repair services from tech support companies Restoro and Reimage.The FTC sued Restoro and Reimage, and the companies paid money to settle. According to the lawsuit, these companies used misleading online ads and fake Microsoft Windows pop-up screens to scare people into paying for computer repair services. They claimed to find viruses and other problems –
CarShield Settlement
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } December 2025 FTC sends checks to eligible people who paid for a vehicle service contract The FTC is sending 168,179 checks totaling more than $9.6 million to eligible people who paid CarShield for a vehicle service contract between September 2019 and September 2024, and had their claim denied.According to the FTC, CarShield ads and telemarketing promised that “you’ll never pay for expensive car repairs again.” But the FTC says those ads were deceptive and misleading, and that many cus
University of Phoenix Settlement
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } September 2025 The FTC is sending payments to eligible University of Phoenix students. According to the FTC, the University of Phoenix relied on deceptive advertising to attract students, falsely claiming to work with employers such as Microsoft, Twitter, Adobe, and Yahoo to create job opportunities for University of Phoenix students and tailoring its curriculum for the job needs of such companies.The FTC previously sent payments in March 2021 and July 2023, resulting in more than $48.
RevMountain Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } August 2025 FTC sends second payment to people who lost money to a deceptive marketing scheme The FTC is sending a second round of payments to people who were charged by RevMountain LLC, a marketing company that promised low-cost trials for tooth whiteners and other products but charged expensive hidden fees.In August 2017, the FTC sued RevMountain and related corporate defendants, alleging they used deceptive claims and confusing terms to trick people into providing their billing info
Consumer Health Benefits Association Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } August 2025 FTC sends second payment to people who lost money to a medical discount scheme The FTC is sending a second round of payments to people who paid Consumer Health Benefits Association (CHBA) for deceptive medical discount plans sold as health insurance.The FTC sued CHBA, alleging that the company sold misleading medical discount plans to people looking for health insurance and made it hard for customers to get refunds or cancel their plans. According to the lawsuit, the compan
I Works Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } May 2025 FTC sends additional refunds to people charged by I Works The FTC is sending payments to people who paid I Works for government-grant and money-making products.The FTC sued I Works for false advertising and for billing customers without their consent. The company ran multiple online campaigns that falsely advertised that federal grants were generally available for personal use and that people could make a lot of money using I Works products. When people gave their credit or de
DeVry Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } May 2024 FTC sends payment to people harmed by deceptive advertising claims The FTC is sending payments to students who were harmed by DeVry’s deceptive claims and previously received a check which they did not cash.According to the FTC, DeVry’s advertisements made deceptive claims about the likelihood that graduates would find jobs in their fields and earn more after graduation than those graduating with bachelor’s degrees from other colleges or universities.The FTC first mailed check
Razer Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } January 2025 Products Zephyr face masks FTC sends full refund payments to people who paid for Zephyr face masks The FTC is sending 6,764 payments totaling more than $1 million to people who bought Zephyr face masks from Razer.According to the FTC, Razer falsely advertised their Zephyr face masks as N95-grade masks. That wasn’t true, and the masks were never certified as N95.To settle the FTC’s charges, the company paid money and agreed to stop making misleading health claims. The FTC i
Warrior Trading Refunds
Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Competition Matters How Loyalty Discounts Between Firms Harm Competition When There Are Network Effects: FTC v. Surescripts Matthew Chesnes (DAD, BE Antitrust I) and Ted Rosenbaum (Acting BE Director) February 13, 2026 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Technology Blog The FTC Is on the Front Lines of Tech Innovation & Regulation Stephanie T. Nguyen, Chief Technologist January 17, 2025 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Press Release FTC to Require Cox Media Group, Two Other Firms to Pay Nearly $1 Million to Settle Charges They Deceived Customers About “Active Listening” AI-Powered Marketing Service May 21, 2026 Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM Jun17 Oral Argument Before the Commission: Caremark Rx/Zinc Health Services, et al (Insulin) Wednesday, June 17, 2026 | 2:00PM figure:has(article.align-right):has(figcaption) .align-right.media--type-image { float: right; } .block ~ .block.block-system-main-block { margin-top: 0; } November 2024 FTC sends second payment to people who paid for investment programs The FTC is sending a second round of payments to customers who paid for Warrior Trading’s investment programs.According to the FTC’s lawsuit, Warrior Trading made misleading and unrealistic claims that its day trading "system" would result in big investment gains for customers. In its advertisements, Warrior Trading showcased the trading results of its CEO and founder, Ross Cameron, claiming that his stra
Instacart Misleading Prices and Fees Canadian Class Action
Instacart Drip Pricing and Double Ticketing Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (1) ON Feb 12, 2025 [en] Statement of Claim CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Canadian consumers situated outside of the province of Québec against the designer, developer, and operator of grocery shopping and delivery platform Instacart, namely, Maplebear Inc. and its Canadian subsidiaries Maplebear Canada Inc., Maplebear Delivery Canada Inc., and Maplebear Logistics Canada Inc. (Maplebear). The proposed class action alleges that Maplebear fails to disclose the all-in pricing of purchases made by consumers on the Instacart.ca website and on the Instacart mobile application, and then charges delivery fees, service fees, purchase prices and/or other fees higher than what is initially represented or indicated to consumers when completing transactions on the website and app. The process of completing transactions on the Instacart website and application consists of five stages. Stage 1: The consumer selects the retailer from which they wish to arrange a delivery; Stage 2: The consumer selects the items they wish to have delivered from that retailer; Stage 3: A list of all items selected by the consumer and the total price consisting of the addi
Ford F-150 Lightning EV Canadian Class Action
Ford F-150 Lightning EV Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (1) ON Jan 14, 2026 [en] Statement of Claim CONSUMER LAW GROUP has instituted a Canadian class action lawsuit against Ford and Qmerit for the following alleged misrepresentations: 1) The Home Integration System is only available in the United States and is not available in Canada; 2) The Ford Charge Station Pro is incapable of charging F-150 Lightning EVs at a rate of “80 amps on demand”; 3) An electrician can install Ford Charge Stations, however Ford recommends a Qmerit electrician for the installation of Ford Charge Stations, which is significantly higher than that which would be charged by a qualified non-Qmerit electrician; 4) The Ford Connected Charge Station (retail price of $1,099.95) is compatible with and can be used to charge Ford F-150 Lightning EVs – rather than only the Ford Mustang-E and Ford E-Transit – as there is no appreciable difference in performance with the Ford Charge Station Pro (retail price of $1,799.95). You are a class member is you are a "resident in Canada who leased or purchased a 2022–2026 model year Ford F-150 Lightning Electric Vehicle". The lawsuit alleges that Ford made misleading representations and omissions in advertising, marketing, and instructional m
Evenflo Big Kid Booster Car Seat Canadian Class Action
Evenflo Big Kid Booster Car Seat Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (2) ON Jun 05, 2020 [en] Statement of Claim QC Jun 03, 2020 [en] Amended Application for Authorization CONSUMER LAW GROUP has launched a Canada-wide class action lawsuit against Evenflo Company, Inc. and Goodbaby Canada Inc. for falsely and misleadingly representing and advertising their "Big Kid" car booster seats as "side-impact tested" and safe for children as small as 40 pounds. A February 6, 2020 ProPublica report detailed internal concerns from at least one Evenflo engineer about the sale of the booster seat. ProPublica’s report also detailed a flurry of lawsuits, some settled confidentially, against the company and its competitors that allege a slew of catastrophic injuries, including paralysis and traumatic brain injuries, were caused by the Big Kid booster seat and similar devices. Videos of the defendants' side-impact crash testing reveal that child-sized crash test dummies placed in Big Kid booster seats and subject to T-bone-style collisions are thrown far out of their shoulder belts, indicating that a child who experienced a real-life crash may very well have suffered catastrophic head, neck, and/or spinal trauma. The supposedly "rig
TFI International (TFII) Stock Price Drop Canadian Class Action
TFI International (TFII) Stock Price Drop Canadian Class Action !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+'://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js';fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs'); lang: en_US Share Active Join This Class Action .documentsbtn span.plus, .documentsbtn span.minus{ display:none; } .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="false"] span.plus, .documentsbtn[aria-expanded="true"] span.minus{ display:block; float: left; margin: 0 10px 0px 0; } + - Documents (1) QC Apr 22, 2025 [en] Application for Authorization CONSUMER LAW GROUP has filed a national class action against TFI International Inc. and some of its executives on behalf of shareholders of its stock that purchased or otherwise acquired TFII securities between April 26, 2024 and February 19, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). TFI is a transportation and logistics company that operates in the United States and Canada. TFI’s common stock trades on both the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the under the symbol “TFII”. The proposed lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period, TFI made materially false and/or misleading statements, and also failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, prospects, and operations. Specifically, it failed to disclose to investors: (1) that the Company was losing small and medium business customers; (2) that, as a result, the Company’s TForce revenue was decreasing; (3) that TFI was experiencing difficulties managing its costs; (4) that, as a result of the foregoing, the profitability of its largest business segment was decreasing; and (5) that, as a result of
See every settlement you qualify for
Tell SettleScout which brands you use and it matches you with open settlements, estimates your payouts, and reminds you before every deadline.
Download on the App StoreFree to download. Premium plans available.